EN / ES
Book a call

Sales & Market Entry in India

Manufacturing & Sourcing

Onesto Legal

People & On-Ground Support

Europe Desk EU

Featured

Enquire With Us
EN / ES

AI Regulation vs AI Innovation

Will the EU AI Act Slow Europe Down — and Benefit India?

ONESTO MANAGEMENT CONSULTANCY  |  EDITION 09  |  FEBRUARY 2026

By Shashank Ram Malik, CEO, Onesto Management Consultancy

Artificial Intelligence is no longer just a technology race. It has become a regulatory race — and how you position yourself in that race will define your competitive future.

Earlier this month, I was reviewing two very different news items on my desk — one about the EU AI Act’s compliance timelines tightening, and another about India’s IndiaAI Global Summit in New Delhi, drawing global policymakers and founders to the same table. The contrast was impossible to ignore.

Europe is busy codifying risk. India is accelerating deployment.

Both moves are deliberate. Both have consequences. And if you’re running a business that touches technology, supply chains, or cross-border trade — this is a conversation you cannot afford to miss.

1. What the EU AI Act Actually Requires

The EU AI Act, formally adopted in 2024, is the world’s first comprehensive legal framework for artificial intelligence. It takes a risk-based approach, which sounds reasonable until you start reading the fine print.

AI systems are categorized into four tiers:

▸ Unacceptable Risk — banned outright. Think social scoring systems and certain biometric surveillance tools.

▸ High Risk — heavily regulated. This covers AI in healthcare, recruitment, financial services, law enforcement, and critical infrastructure.

▸ Limited Risk — transparency obligations apply. Chatbots, for instance, must disclose that users are interacting with AI.

▸ Minimal Risk — largely left alone. Spam filters, AI in games, and basic recommendation engines.

For high-risk systems, companies must implement conformity assessments, risk management frameworks, human oversight mechanisms, robust data governance, technical documentation, and ongoing post-market monitoring. Non-compliance can cost up to €35 million or 7% of global annual turnover — whichever is higher.

The law phases in progressively between 2025 and 2027. For enterprises operating across borders, AI governance is quickly becoming as business-critical as GDPR compliance once was.

Europe has chosen trust, transparency, and human-centric design as its competitive differentiators. But regulation is never neutral in cost.

2. The Compliance Cost Gap — and Why It Matters

Let me put some numbers on this. Preliminary industry estimates suggest compliance costs for high-risk AI systems could range from 5% to 15% of total development costs, depending on the sector and system complexity.

For large enterprises, that’s manageable. They have legal teams, compliance units, and the infrastructure to absorb it. For startups, it can be existential — extended development cycles, certification delays, legal consultancy fees, and market entry barriers that competitors in less-regulated jurisdictions simply don’t face.

This raises a structural question that nobody is asking loudly enough: Does heavy regulation entrench incumbents while quietly suffocating early-stage innovation? The honest answer is — potentially, yes.

3. India’s Positioning After the Delhi Summit

The IndiaAI Global Summit sent a clear signal: India is no longer content being the world’s back-office IT service provider. The ambition now is to become a genuine AI innovation powerhouse.

India’s current AI strategy leans on a very different philosophy — public–private partnerships, AI infrastructure expansion, startup support, and sector-specific deployment across agriculture, healthcare, logistics, and governance. Most importantly, the regulatory approach is deliberately light-touch, focusing on principles rather than prescriptive rules.

What this creates in practice is a significantly faster environment for prototyping, experimentation, and commercialization. Lower upfront compliance burden. Less regulatory uncertainty in the early stages. The freedom to try things and course-correct quickly.

In essence, India is betting on scale and speed. Europe is betting on safety and trust. The world needs both — which is precisely where the opportunity lies.

4. Could Regulation Shift Where Innovation Happens?

Historically, innovation moves to where friction is lowest, and capital is most agile. If EU compliance adds meaningful cost and delay, and investors are optimizing for faster commercialization, it is entirely plausible that AI product development increasingly originates in more flexible jurisdictions — including India.

But there is a powerful counterargument, and it deserves serious consideration.

The EU AI Act may well create what economists call a ‘Brussels Effect’ — similar to what happened with GDPR — where global companies design their products according to European standards simply because access to the EU market demands it. If that plays out, Indian startups targeting European clients will still need to comply, regardless of where they build.

The real strategic question then becomes: will companies build first for speed and retrofit for Europe later? Or will they design for global compliance from day one?

My view, for what it’s worth: the companies that get ahead of this early — that treat compliance as architecture, not an afterthought — will have a structural advantage that latecomers will struggle to match.

5. AI Regulation as the New Trade Barrier

Here’s something that hasn’t received enough attention in mainstream business media: AI regulation is quietly becoming a new form of non-tariff trade governance.

Under the EU AI Act, AI embedded in exported products may require conformity documentation. AI-powered medical devices, HR platforms, and fintech tools entering the EU will face certification hurdles. Cross-border data flows must align with both GDPR and the new AI governance frameworks.

This means compliance is no longer just a legal obligation — it’s a competitive filter. For Indian firms targeting EU markets, early alignment with European standards could become a genuine market differentiator. For EU firms, heavy domestic regulation may push certain R&D activities offshore while keeping compliance functions at home.

The result is a hybrid model of AI globalization — one where the rules are written in Brussels, the code is built in Bengaluru, and the value is captured globally by whoever understands both.

6. Two Futures — Which One Are We Building?

I see two plausible scenarios playing out over the next five years:

Scenario A: Regulatory Drag

Europe slows in frontier AI development, losing startup momentum to more agile ecosystems. The regulatory burden concentrates innovation elsewhere, and Europe becomes a consumer rather than a creator of AI capability.

Scenario B: The Trust Premium Advantage

Europe becomes the go-to market for ‘safe AI’ — attracting enterprise clients who prioritize reliability, transparency, and legal certainty. Meanwhile, India becomes the scale laboratory, the deployment engine, the applied AI powerhouse. If Europe sets the rules and India builds at scale, collaboration — not competition — defines the next decade.

I think Scenario B is more likely. But only if decision-makers in both ecosystems are honest about the trade-offs and intentional about building bridges between them.

7. Three Structural Shifts Worth Watching

▸ AI as Infrastructure — AI is transitioning from a product differentiator to an embedded utility. It will become invisible infrastructure in energy, logistics, finance, and public services. The governance question shifts from ‘how do we regulate AI products’ to ‘how do we regulate AI-dependent systems.’

▸ Compliance as Core Strategy — Legal architecture is becoming as important as the codebase itself. Companies that invest in regulatory intelligence early will outcompete those that treat it as a checkbox exercise.

▸ Geopolitical Fragmentation — Divergent AI governance models across the EU, US, India, and China will reshape global digital trade in ways we haven’t fully mapped yet. The IndiaAI Summit and the EU AI Act are opening moves in a much longer game.

Final Thought

The global AI race is no longer just about who builds the best models. It is about who builds systems that survive regulation, cross borders, and scale sustainably.

Speed matters. But structured innovation — built on a foundation of regulatory awareness, cross-border intelligence, and long-term thinking — is what separates the companies that lead from those that follow.

As someone who works at the intersection of India, Europe, and global trade every day, I find this moment genuinely exciting. The rules are being written in real time. The question is whether we’re in the room where it happens — or reading about it afterward.

For deeper insights on EU–India trade, regulation, and the strategic shifts shaping global business, follow the Onesto Consultancy page on LinkedIn.

IndiaAI Impact Summit, New Delhi: Why This Week Matters for the Future of AI

New Delhi is hosting a major global AI gathering this month: the IndiaAI Impact Summit 2026, scheduled for 16–20 February 2026. It’s being positioned as the first major global AI summit hosted in the Global South, with the Government of India framing the conversation around three guiding “sutras”: People, Planet, Progress.

What makes this summit worth watching isn’t just the guest list. It’s the fact that India is trying to shape the global AI agenda around a concept it has already proven at scale in digital governance: public infrastructure that can be reused, audited, and deployed for inclusion.

What exactly is the summit?

The IndiaAI Impact Summit is a Government of India-led convening under the IndiaAI Mission, bringing together global leaders, policymakers, investors, and technology companies. The summit runs alongside a large-scale expo format—designed to showcase AI applications and cross-border collaborations.  According to India’s Ministry of External Affairs, the summit is intended to shape international cooperation on AI, with emphasis on impact areas (health, education, agriculture, governance) and responsible deployment.

Who is attending?

Attendance is being described in tiers: heads of state/government, ministerial delegations, international organizations, and global tech leadership. Multiple reports indicate leaders from at least 20 countries, plus delegations from dozens of countries and international bodies.  A non-exhaustive set of prominent political attendees’ reports includes leaders such as France’s Emmanuel Macron, Brazil’s President Lula, and Spain’s Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez.

There are also reports of US and China ministerial-level representation, underscoring that this is not only a tech conference but also a geopolitical signal: the world’s AI governance conversation is no longer confined to a few Western capitals.

Why India is central to the AI story?

India’s unique leverage is not “having the biggest model.” It’s something more practical and potentially more scalable:

1) India can operationalize AI at a population scale

Few countries have the ability to deploy digital systems across hundreds of millions of citizens. India’s track record with digital public infrastructurehas become a reference point globally—and the summit is explicitly trying to extend that approach into AI.

2) India is pushing the idea of a “Global AI Commons.”

One of the most interesting strategic narratives emerging from this summit is India’s push for a global “AI commons”—a shared repository of AI use-cases and interoperable building blocks for areas like education, health, and agriculture—especially to benefit the Global South.

That idea challenges a world where foundational AI capabilities are controlled by a small number of firms and countries—and it aligns with India’s broader diplomatic stance: “democratize access, standardize interoperability, reduce dependency.”

Why does this matter for Spain–India and EU–India business?

Spain and the EU have an immediate stake in how AI governance evolves in 2026–2030:

Spain’s participation—especially at the leadership level—also signals that AI is now a pillar in broader bilateral engagement, not a separate “tech conversation.”

The future of AI: what 2026 is really about

Here’s the shift that serious operators are making now:

AI is moving from “models” to “systems.”

The next wave is less about who has the most impressive demo—and more about who can deploy AI with:

Expect “AI governance” to become a trade and investment filter

As AI is embedded into healthcare, finance, mobility, and government services, trust becomes a competitive advantage. Countries and companies will increasingly ask: Can you prove your AI is safe, fair, and compliant—at scale?

The biggest battleground is inclusion vs concentration

India’s “AI commons” push highlights the global debate:

Will AI become a concentrated capability (few owners) or a widely usable infrastructure (shared building blocks)?

Onesto takeaway

This summit is not just about speeches. It’s about who gets to define the rules and the building blocks for the next decade of AI adoption.

For companies operating between India and Europe, the immediate opportunity is clear: build partnerships that combine Indian execution capacity with European governance standards—because the future winners will be those who can scale AI responsibly.

Subscribe to the India-Spain Trade Pulse and follow our page for more grounded, cross-border insights on AI, trade, and the real-world execution layer behind global headlines.

India–Spain Trade: Where the Relationship Actually Stands

India and Spain do not dominate headlines as a trade pair—but the numbers and trends tell a different story.

As of 2023–2024:

This growth is structural, not cyclical.

It is driven by:

What Spain Exports to India (High-Value, Not High-Volume)

Spanish exports to India are technology- and capability-driven, not commodity-led.

Trend worth noting:

Spanish firms increasingly export technology plus know-how, while localizing assembly or sourcing in India.

This hybrid model is becoming the preferred market-entry strategy.

What India Exports to Spain (Scale, Cost Efficiency)

India’s exports to Spain reflect its manufacturing depth and cost competitiveness, but the profile is evolving.

Over the last few years:

Policy Reality: Trade Is Increasing, Compliance Is Tightening

Two policy developments matter most in 2025:

1. EU Sustainability & Traceability Rules

2. EU–India Trade Negotiations (FTA Context)

Insight:

Companies waiting for an FTA before restructuring their trade model are already late.

Where Deals Commonly Break Down

In Onesto’s advisory work, failures rarely come from lack of demand.

They come from:

Trade between India and Spain is less forgiving than before—but far more rewarding when done right.

Strategic Shift We Are Seeing in 2025

Spanish companies are moving from:

“Export to India” → “Integrate India into our value chain”

Indian companies are moving from:

“Sell into Spain” → “Use Spain as an EU base”

This shift explains:

Onesto Perspective

India–Spain trade in 2025 is no longer opportunistic.

It is:

Success depends on getting the model right before the shipment moves.

At Onesto, we work where: policy meets operations, and law meets execution—helping companies build trade structures that survive audits, regulations, and scale.

Follow : India-Spain Trade Pulse

Each edition will deliver:

Which sector should we analyze next—Automotive, Textiles, Engineering, or Food?

Why 2026 Will Be a Turning Point? : From Growth to Strategic Consolidation

Introduction: Why 2026 Will Be Different?

The period between 2024 and 2025 was defined by adjustment. Companies re-aligned supply chains, reassessed geopolitical risk, and responded to tightening regulatory environments in Europe.

2026 will mark a structural shift.

Trade between India and Spain—and more broadly between India and the European Union—will move from expansion driven by opportunity to consolidation driven by strategy. The coming year will not reward speed or opportunism. It will reward preparedness, compliance, and long-term alignment.

For companies operating across these corridors, the question for 2026 is no longer whether trade will grow, but who will remain relevant when it does.

The Macro Forecast: How India–Spain Trade Will Evolve in 2026

Consolidation Over Proliferation

By 2026, Spanish and EU companies are expected to reduce the number of active suppliers while deepening relationships with those that remain. This trend is already visible in automotive, engineering, and industrial goods, where buyers increasingly prioritise reliability, traceability, and contractual clarity over short-term cost advantages.

Indian exporters, in turn, will face a market that views them not as interchangeable vendors but as long-term strategic partners. Those unable to adapt to this expectation risk gradual exclusion rather than abrupt rejection.

Compliance as a Commercial Advantage

Regulatory readiness will become one of the most decisive competitive factors in 2026.

EU sustainability frameworks, origin verification requirements, carbon reporting obligations, and product-specific standards are no longer administrative hurdles. They directly influence:

Companies that integrate compliance into their commercial strategy will gain negotiation leverage. Those that treat it as a post-contract formality will struggle to scale.In practical terms, compliance will shift from cost centre to value driver.

Spain’s Strengthening Role as a European Gateway

Spain’s position within EU–India trade will continue to strengthen in 2026. Beyond bilateral trade volumes, Spain increasingly functions as:

Indian companies that establish a structured presence in Spain—whether through representation, partnerships, or subsidiaries—will gain faster access to EU markets than those relying solely on direct exports.

Sector Forecasts: Where Growth Will Actually Occur in 2026 ?

Automotive and Electric Mobility

The automotive sector will remain one of the most structurally resilient areas of India–Spain trade.

In 2026, growth will be driven less by complete vehicle systems and more by:

Spanish and EU buyers will demand higher auditability, lifecycle compliance, and engineering validation. Indian suppliers with mature quality systems and technical depth will outperform purely cost-driven competitors.The key differentiator will be engineering maturity, not pricing.

Engineering and Technology Services

Engineering and Technology-as-a-Service (TaaS) will be among the fastest-growing segments in 2026.

European firms face rising in-house costs and talent shortages, accelerating the shift toward:

India’s role will expand from manufacturing support to engineering extension of EU firms. This transition will reward companies that invest in process alignment, IP clarity, and cross-border contractual robustness.

Textiles and Apparel

Textiles will experience moderate growth but sharp selectivity. By 2026:

Exporters that fail to align with EU sustainability frameworks will find themselves excluded not by regulation, but by buyer risk policies.

Food, Agri, and Processed Products

Food and agri-trade will continue to grow, driven by Europe’s need for diversified sourcing. However, the sector will be among the most documentation-intensive in 2026.

Success will depend on:

The market opportunity is real—but accessible only to exporters prepared for regulatory scrutiny.

Trade in 2026 Will Reward Structure

By 2026, cross-border trade will no longer tolerate improvisation.

Successful companies will be those that:

The winners will not necessarily be the largest or the cheapest—but the most prepared.

We operate at the intersection of policy, law, and execution, helping companies build trade frameworks designed to withstand audits, regulation, and long-term growth.

Visit Our Website For More Details: www.onestoconsultancy.com